OpenClaw Slack Integration: App Setup, Permissions, Threading, and Production Safety

I'm Anna. To be honest, I didn't start this because I love integrations. I started because I kept dropping tiny to-dos I mentioned in Slack, "remind me Friday," "save this link," "draft a reply later." They floated away. I wanted**** OpenClaw to quietly catch those crumbs and nudge me at the right time. So I set up a Slack app to connect with OpenClaw. I expected it to be fussy. Parts of it were. But once the pieces clicked, it felt… light.

I'll walk through what I actually did, where I tripped, and the few choices that made the OpenClaw Slack setup feel safe and sane for everyday use.

Slack app setup overview

Create app in Slack workspace

I typed "I'll handle this Friday" in a channel and immediately felt that sinking "I won't" feeling. I opened Slack's dashboard and created a new app from scratch (not a manifest). If you're starting fresh, the path is simple enough: create an app in your workspace, add a bot user, set OAuth scopes, then install it. The UI still hides some details one click too deep, but you can get from "new app" to "installed bot" in about 10 minutes if you have your scopes in mind.

OpenClaw connector role

I kept the OpenClaw side intentionally simple: it's just a small web service that receives Slack events, verifies signatures, decides whether to respond, and posts messages back. Think of it like a translator sitting between Slack and your assistant, not a control center.

In practice, the connector does four things:

1. Verifies Slack's request using the signing secret.
2. Parses events (mentions, thread replies, reactions if you want those).
3. Decides whether the content should reach OpenClaw (I filter for @mentions or a keyword like "claw:" to avoid eavesdropping).
4. Sends a reply via chat.postMessage or chat.update, ideally into the same thread.

I ran it locally behind a tunneling URL during setup, then moved it to a small server once it behaved. Nothing clever. That was the point.

OAuth scopes and permissions

Minimum required scopes (least privilege)

I went in with one rule: least privilege or I'll never feel comfortable leaving it on. For a basic mention-and-reply loop, these were the minimum that worked for me:

• app_mentions:read, so the bot sees "@OpenClaw" pings.
• chat:write, so it can respond.
• channels:history and groups:history (optional), only if you want it to see non-mention messages in channels it's in. I skipped these at first.
• im:history (optional), if you want DMs to the bot. Again, optional.
• users:read (optional), handy for polite addressing or permission checks by user ID.

Scopes cheat sheet by use case

Here's what actually mapped to my everyday scenarios:

• Simple helper that only responds when tagged in public channels: app_mentions:read, chat:write.
• Private channels with invites (project pods): add groups:read and groups:history, but only if you need to read thread context.
• DMs to the bot for quick notes or "remind me" prompts: im:read (for channel info) and im:history, plus chat:write.
• Reactions as triggers (e.g., add :bookmark: to save): reactions:read (and channels/groups history if you need surrounding text).
• File uploads (rare for me, sometimes useful for summaries): files:write to post generated files back.

If you feel the urge to add broad history scopes "just in case," stop. I regretted that the first time, it made me second-guess what the bot could see. Adding scopes gradually kept the OpenClaw Slack setup feeling safe.

Slack's scope reference remains the source of truth if you're unsure. Their page on granular bot scopes is clear enough once you know your target surfaces.

Bot token vs user token

Short version: use a bot token unless you absolutely need user-level access. A user token will reach places you probably don't want an assistant wandering (like DMs you didn't invite it to). Bot tokens:

• Respect which channels the bot is in.
• Are predictable with events (you won't suddenly ingest the entire org's messages).
• Make permission conversations simpler: "If you add @OpenClaw to the channel, it can help."

I tested a user token briefly to compare. It worked, but it felt like walking around with every key on one ring. I didn't need that. Back to the bot token.

Event subscriptions and message delivery

Configure event subscriptions

This was the first real friction. Slack splits "App unfurls and shortcuts" from "Events API," and it's not obvious until you land in the right tab. I enabled the Events API and added app_mention to start. If you plan to respond in DMs, add message.im. For channel message patterns (like keyword triggers), add message.channels or message.groups accordingly, but only if you're comfortable with the visibility that implies.

Don't forget to toggle "Subscribe to bot events," not just workspace events. That mismatch cost me a confusing five minutes where nothing arrived.

Request URL and verification

Slack pings your request URL for two reasons: URL verification and event delivery. You'll need to respond to the initial challenge with the plain challenge string. After that, every real request should be verified.

Verification that worked reliably for me:

• Use Slack's signing secret.
• Read X-Slack-Request-Timestamp and X-Slack-Signature.
• Build the v0 signature with the timestamp and raw body, then compare using a constant-time check.

Which events to subscribe to

I ended up with a narrow set:

• app_mention, the main trigger for help on demand.
• message.im, for direct messages to the bot.
• reaction_added (optional), I toggle this on when I'm in "save to notes" mode using a specific emoji.

I skipped message.channels until I had a specific pattern I trusted (e.g., "claw:" prefix). It's too easy to build something that feels nosy.

Slack's app_mention event docs are straightforward, and the Events API page explains rate behaviors and retries, which matter more than you think.

Verify message flow end-to-end

My test loop looked like this:

1. Post "@OpenClaw remind me Friday at 2pm to email Sam" in a test channel.
2. Confirm the event shows in Slack's app dashboard logs.
3. Watch the connector logs for receipt and signature pass.
4. Confirm the bot replies in-thread within a second or two.

The first run didn't save time. I was staring and checking logs. But by the third or fourth try, it reduced mental effort, I posted, moved on, and trusted the thread would hold the promise. That mental quiet is the point.

Thread handling that works

Why threading matters

If the bot answers in-channel without a thread, people feel watched. If it threads replies, it feels like a helpful aside. Also, your future self will thank you when you search for that reminder next week.

Thread reply patterns

What worked best was simple:

• Always reply in the same thread as the trigger (use thread_ts from the incoming event).
• Acknowledge lightly: "Got it, I'll nudge you Friday at 2pm."
• If there's more than one step (e.g., parsing a long ask), post a quick "Working on it…" in the thread, then update or follow up. It's less jarring than a silent 10-second wait.

When posting back, I used chat.postMessage with thread_ts set. If I needed to update, chat.update worked fine, but I try not to overwrite messages unless it removes noise.

Common threading pitfalls

I hit these in the first hour:

• Forgetting to include thread_ts when replying to an app_mention that started in a thread, easy miss, noisy result.
• Replying to edited messages: message_changed events can retrigger logic. I de-duped using Slack's event_id and ignored edits unless they changed intent.
• Broadcasting thread replies accidentally: reply_broadcast posts to the channel, I left that off by default.
• Losing context when moving across channels: threads don't travel. If I needed cross-channel context, I summarized it in the reply instead of chasing it.

Parent message context

When I needed a bit more context (like the original ask before an edit), I fetched the parent with conversations.replies limited to 1 using the thread_ts. That was enough for OpenClaw to keep the right reference without requesting full channel history. I only enabled channels/groups history when a specific workflow truly needed it.

Production-safe controls

User permission checks

I added two quiet brakes:

• Respond only when explicitly @mentioned or DMed. No ambient listening.
• Maintain a small allowlist for who can trigger certain actions (like scheduling external reminders). If someone outside the list pings it, the bot responds with a polite "I'm not set up for that here yet."

That cut confusion and made it clear this wasn't a free-for-all automation bot.

Rate limiting configuration

Slack is generous until it isn't. You'll eventually hit limits if you post too fast or fetch too much. I handle three things:

• Respect 429s with the Retry-After header. Don't guess.
• Add jittered backoff for bursts (especially when the app comes online and flushes queued replies).
• Coalesce edits: if multiple updates happen quickly, prefer one clean message over five small ones.

Preventing spam and runaway automation

My personal rules that kept this calm:

• Ignore events from bots, including itself (check subtype and bot_id).
• De-duplicate with event_id and a short-lived cache.
• Add simple guardrails like a max reply length, and refuse to post if the output looks repetitive or off-topic.
• For reminders, cap the count per user per hour. If someone pastes a long list, the bot suggests a summary instead of spamming the channel.

None of this is fancy. But it's why I trust leaving the app installed: it behaves like a considerate teammate, not a script on a sugar high.

If you just want your reminders and AI tasks to run quietly without wiring Slack apps, scopes, and event handlers yourself, that overhead is real. We built Macaron to let you generate and run practical AI mini-tools in one place, without stitching everything together by hand.

Try Macaron here now!